Biocidal Activity Of Four Plants For Medicinal Use In The Laguna De Lachuá National Park
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.EdicionEspecial2005.194%20Keywords:
Biocidal activity, Laguna de Lachua National ParkAbstract
The main objective of this research was to determine the biocidal activity of four plants for medicinal use in the Laguna de Lachuá National Park (PNLL), using standardized methods for bacteria, fungi, yeasts, protozoa, larvae, and cytotoxicity against Artemia salina. The plants under study were selected from a total of 209 reported in the ethnobotanical survey carried out by Cleaves in the year 2000 (1). The selection criteria included not having been studied previously, according to the N APIRALERT rat base, and being native to the region under study (2-7). Prior to the respective biological analyses, the ethanolic extracts of the plants under study were obtained by precolation with 95% ethanol and vacuum evaporation. It was shown that the extracts of two of the four plants had positive biocidal activities, these being: Piper aeruginosibaccum with activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium smegmalis and Bacillus subtilis, up to a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml, positive activity against epimastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi a a concentration of 1 mg/ml and cytotoxic activity against nauplii of A. salina at a concentration of 0.69 mg/ml. The plant specimen Hyptis verlicillata, showed activity against epimastigotes of 1. cruzi at a concentration of 0.92 mg/mL and against promastigotes of. Leishmania brazíliensis at a concentration of 0.81 mg/mL, Cissampelos tropaeolifolia and Passiflora coriacea species did not show any bioactivity. These data were not known and constitute the basis for future research that seeks to explore in greater depth the biological properties demonstrated. They can also be used to scientifically guide the use of plants for medicinal purposes.
Downloads
References
Cleaves, C. 2000. Etnobotánica Médica de Cinco Comunidades de la Zona de Influencia del Parque Nacional Laguna Lachuá (PNLL), Alta Vcrapaz, Guatemala. Tesis Licenciada en Biología, Proyecto Lachuá -Escuela de Biología. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala (USAC) / Instituto Nacional de Bosques (INAB ) / UICN.
CYTED. 1993. Manual de técnicas de investigación. Bogotá. Proyecto X-l, S/P.
Bracanto FP & Golding NS. 1983. The diameter of the mould colony as a reliable measure of growth, J. My col. 45: 848-863, https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1953.12024321
Mac Rae WD el al. 1988 Studies of the pharmacological activity of Amazonian Eitphorbiacae. J. Ethnopharmacol. 22:143-172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(88)90124-9
González J el al. 1990. In vitro activity of natural products againts the Irypomastigote from of Trypanosoma cruzi. Phylotcr. Res. 4:1-4, https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2650040102
Caceres A et al. 1 998. Plants used in guatcmala for treatment of protozoal infections. I. Screening of activity to bacteria, fungi and American Trypanosomes of 13 native plants. J Ethnopharmacol (62): 195-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00140-8
Mishra S K et al. 1987. Insecticidal and nematical properties of microbial metabolites. J. Indust. Microbiol. 2: 267-276, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569429
Conservation of Lake Lachuá and sustainable development of its influence arca. Disponible en www.uicnhumedales.org/index.htm.
X.A.D.S. 1978. Plantas de interés terapéutico e industrial.. Monterrey, Ed. Limusa.. pp.ll, 13.
Varea, A. el al. 1997. Biodivcrsidad, Bioprospección v Bioseguridad. Quito, Ed. Abyayala. pp. 151-159.
Ríos J. L. ,etal. 1988. Screening methods for natural products with antimicrobial activity; a review of the literature. J. Ethnopharmacol. 28: 1 27-149.
Berger I. et al. 1998. Plants used in Guatemala for the treatment of protozoal infections II. Activity of extracts and fractions ol live Guatemalan plants against Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Ethnopharmacol. 62:107-115, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00011-7
Caceres A er al. 1993. Plants used in Guatemala for the treatment of dermatophytic infections. 1. Screening of antimycotic activity of 44 plant extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 40:207-213.
Hocquemiller R et al. 1991 Isolement syntese of 1 espinatol, nouveae antiparatiaire. J. Nat. Prod. 54:445-452, https://doi.org/10.1021/np50074a015
Fournet A et al. 1994. Leishmanicidal and trypanocidal activities of Bolivian medicinal plants. J . Ethnopharmacol. 37:159-264, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(92)90074-2
Berger I et al. 2001. Antiprotozoal activity of Neurolaena labata. Pliytother. Res. 15: 327-330, https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.782
Nirmal S el al. 1998. Larvicidal Activity of Gliricidia sepium Against Mosquito Larvae of Anopheles stephansi, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. Pharmaceutical Biol. 36: 3-7, https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.36.1.3.4616
Sam Wah T. Colegate FM & Molineux RJ. 1993. Toxicity testing using the brine shrimp. Artemia salina. IN, Bioactive Natural products. Detection, isolation and structural determination. Boca Raton. CRC Press, pp. 441-456.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Gelbert Solis, Armando Cáceres, Cecilia Cleaves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons 4.0, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a compartir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo: en repositorios institucionales o páginas web personales) antes y durante el proceso de envío del manuscrito, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos, a una mayor y más rápida citación del trabajo publicado.