Evaluation Of The Biocidal Activity And Chemical Identification Of Valepotriates In Four Species Popularly Recognized In Guatemala As Valerian

Authors

  • Ada Cruz Escuela de Química Farmacéutica Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala
  • Sully M. Cruz Escuela de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala
  • Isabel Gaitán Escuela de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala
  • Armando Cáceres Escuela de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.EdicionEspecial2005.202%20

Keywords:

Evaluation, Bocidal activity, Chemical identification, Valepotriates, Guatemala, Valerian

Abstract

The study of four plants is reported, three of them are popularly called valerian in Guatemala, due to the sedative property they supposedly possess, these plants are Vetiveria zizatiioides L., Chaptalia nutans L., Perezia nudicaulis Gray. The fourth plant is Valeriana prionophylla Stand!, belonging to the genus Valeriana and used for the same purpose.


The main objective of the research was the chemical identification of valerenic acid and hydroxvalerenic acid, in plants popularly called Valerian, since these metabolites are specific for the Valerian genus and are what give it its sedative effect. Additionally, other valepotriates such as valtrate, didrovaltrate and acevaltrate were identified. The root of Valeriana officinalis L. was used as standard, while E prionophylla was included in the study. plant in Guatemala without studies carried out so far. The chemical identification was carried out by means of thin layer chromatography, resulting in the presence of these molecules in the root of the plants called Valeriana, being more abundant in the root of C. nutans, followed by V zizanioides and finally P. nudicaulis. The root of V. prionophylla showed the presence of bands characteristic of valepotriates as expected, but it was still larger than E officinalis.


Another objective was the evaluation of the antibacterial, antifungal and insecticidal activity of the plants under study. These analyzes were performed in two phases. The first was the lamiz.aje with cultured microorganisms, exposed to the extract of the roots of the plants at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The second (carried out if the extract inhibits the growth of microorganisms at 1 mg/mL) consisted of determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) at concentrations of 1, 0.5 and 0.25 mg/mL. Being four inactive plants except P. nudicaulis and E prionophylla active against Cryplococcus neoformans at 0.5 and 0.25 mg/mL respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Standley PC & Williams LD. 1976. Flora de Guatemala. Fieldiana: Botany. 24(12):436-437.

Hobbs CH. 1995. Valerian, The Rczaxing and Sep Herb. Capitola, C.A. Botánica. 6p.

Houghton RJ. 1988. The Biological activity of Valerian and related plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 22:121-142, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(88)90123-7

Cañigueral S. et al. 1998. Plantas medicinales y drogas vegetales para infusión y Tisana. Un manual de base científica para Farmacéuticos y Médicos. Milán OEMF International. 542-545.

Wagner H. el al. 1984. Plants drug analysis. Berlin, Springer-Verlag . 263-267, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02398-3_14

CYTED. 1993. Manual de Técnicas de investigación. Bogota, Proyecto X-l.

Cáceres A et al. 1998. Plants used in Guatemala for the treatment of protozoal infections. 1. Screening of activity to bacteria, fungi and American tripanozomes of 13 natives plants. J . Ethn opharmac o 1. 62:195-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00140-8

España SM. et al. 1994. Plants used in Guatemala for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. 5. Vibriocidal activity of the American Plants used to treat diarrhea. Fitotcrapia 65: 273-274.

Mitscher L. el al. 1987. A modem look at folkloric use antiinfective agents. J. Nat. Prod. 5: 1025-1041, https://doi.org/10.1021/np50054a003

Mitscher L. et al. 1972. Antimicrobial agents higher plants. Instroduction, rationale and methodology. Lloydia 35:157-166, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5196-0_10

Brancato FP, Golding NS. The diameter of the mold colony as a reliable measure of growth. J. My col. 1953 45:848-863, https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1953.12024321

Burlingame EM & Reddish GP. 1973. Laboratory methods for testing fungicides used in the treatment of epidermophytoses. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 14: 649-653.

Caceres A. et al. 1993. Plants used in Guatemala for the treatment of dermatophye infections. 3. Evaluation of antifungical activity of seven American plants. J . Ethnopharmacol. 40: 207-213, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(93)90070-L

MacRae WD. et al. Studies of the pharma-cological activity of Amazonian euphorbiaceae. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1988; 22:147-172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(88)90124-9

MacCarthy P. et al. 1992. Antifungical activity of meridine. A natural product from the marine sponge. J. Nat. Prod. 55: 1644-1668, https://doi.org/10.1021/np50089a016

Vanbrenseghem R. etal. 1970. Production of macroconidia by Microspor um ferrugineum OTA 1992. Sabouraudia. 7: 252-256, https://doi.org/10.1080/00362177085190461

Chariandy CM. et al. 1999. Screening of medical plants from Trinidad and Tobago for antimicrobial and insecticidal properties. J. Ethnopharmacol. 62:265-270, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00130-5

Kagan J. et al. 1983. The Phototoxicity of some 1.3-butadienes and relate thiophenes against larva of the mosquito Ac des aegypti and the fruit fly Drosophyla melanogaster. Insecta. Sci. Appl. 4: 377-387, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400002423

Maradufu A. et al. 1978. Isolation of (5-E)-ocinonea mosquito larvicide from Tagetes minuta. Lloydia 41 : 181-183.

Mischra S K el al. 1987. insecticida! and nematical properties of’ microbial metabolites. J. Insdust. Microbiol. 2:267-276, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569429

Thangarn T el al. 1997. Mosquito larvicidal activity of mangrove plant extract and synergistic activity of Rhyzophora apliculata with pyrethrum against Culex quinquefascialns. Int. J. Pharmacog. 35 : 69-71,https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.35.1.69.13263

Zarroug IMA 1988. Evaluation of Sudanese plant extracts as mosquito larvicides. Int. J, Crude Drug Res. 26 : 77-80, https://doi.org/10.3109/13880208809053895

Gao QX & Bjórk L. 2000. Valercnic acid derivatives and valepotriates among individuals, varieties and species of Valeriana. Fitoterapia. 71:19-24, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(99)00094-5

Index Merk. 1998. 10 ed, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8135(98)00002-X

Coelho de Souza G et al. 2004. Ethno-pharmacological studies of antimicrobial remedies in south of Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol . 90:135-143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2003.09.039

Weber S. et al. 1999. Natural Products form Plants. CRC Press LLC. Washingtong. DC. 10. 81-84. 89 p.

Cutler SJ & Cutler HG. 2000. Biologically active natural Products. Pharmaceuticall. CRC Press LLC. Washingtong, DC. 37p.

Medinilla BE. 1999. Manual de Laboratorio de Fitoquimica. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. 13-18p.

Published

2005-12-31

How to Cite

Cruz, A., Cruz, S. M., Gaitán, I., & Cáceres, A. (2005). Evaluation Of The Biocidal Activity And Chemical Identification Of Valepotriates In Four Species Popularly Recognized In Guatemala As Valerian. Revista Científica, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.EdicionEspecial2005.202

Issue

Section

Artículos originales

Most read articles by the same author(s)