Incidence and Etiology of Infectious Vaginitis in Guatemalan Women

Authors

  • L. Acevedo Departamento de Citohistología, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala
  • G. Arroyo Departamento de Citohistología, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.EdicionEspecial2009.181

Keywords:

Incidence, Etiology, Infectious Vaginitis

Abstract

Vaginitis is the pathological process that most frequently affects women of reproductive age and may be responsible, in some cases, for complications and serious consequences for women's health. In Guatemala, there is no precise knowledge of the frequency of these processes, nor of the agents that cause it, which is why this investigation was carried out.

A prospective study was conducted in 594 patients who attended the Pap smear clinic of the Asociación Pro Bienestar de la Familia (APROFAM) in Guatemala City, who were evaluated clinically and through laboratory tests to determine the presence of pathogenic microorganisms.

Using simple laboratory methodology and strict case definitions, 305 patients (51.3%) were determined to have vaginitis. Bacterial vaginosis was the main cause of vaginitis in 33% of cases (196 patients), other conditions included nonspecific vaginitis in 11.8% (70 patients) vaginitis due to Candida sp. In 4.2% (25 patients) and Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis in 2.4% (14 patients). The present work establishes an important basis for the management of patients with vaginitis and points out the importance of bacterial vaginosis in our environment.

Finally, the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the Papanicolaou test for the diagnosis of vaginitis were also determined, taking into account its wide use for the early diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Larsen BL, Galask RP. Vaginal microbial flora: composition and influences of host physiology. Ann Inter Med 1982; 96:926-30, https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-96-6-926

Priestley CJ, Kinghorn R. Bacterial Vaginosis. Br J Clin Pract. 1996; 50(6):331.4.

Cook RL. Et al. Clinical, microbiological, and biochemical factors in recurrent bacterial Vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30(4):870-77, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.4.870-877.1992 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.4.870-877.1992

Spiegel CA. Bacterial Vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991; 4(4):485.502, https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.4.4.485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.4.4.485

Eschenbach DA, Hillier S, Critchlow C, Stevens C, DeRouen T, Holmes KK. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial Vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:919-23, https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(88)90078-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(88)90078-6

Gardner HL, Dukes CD. Haemophillus vaginalis vaginitis. A newly defined specific infection previously classified “non- specific” vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1955; 69:962-76, https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(55)90095-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(55)90095-8

Woodrow N, Lamont RF. Bacterial Vaginosis: its importance in obstetrics. Hosp Med 1998; 59(6):447-50.

Martus J, Eschenbach DA. The role of bacterial vaginosis as a cause of amniotic fluid infection, chrorioamnionitis and prematurity, a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1990; 247:1.13, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390649

Platz-Christensen JJ, Larsson PG, Sundstrom E, Wiqvist N. Detection of bacterial Vaginosis in wet mount, Papanicolaou stained vaginal smears and in gram stained smears. Acta Obs Gynecol Scand. 1995; 74(1):67-70, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349509009947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349509009947

Gravet MG, Nelson HP, De Rouen T, et al. Independent associations of bacterial Vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome. JAMA 1986; 256:1989-1903, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.256.14.1899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.256.14.1899

Kent HL. Epidemiology of vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991, October, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(12)90722-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(12)90722-X

Wathne B, Holst E, Hovelius B, Mardh PA. Vaginal discharge-comparison of clinical laboratory and microbiological findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73:802-8, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349409072509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349409072509

Amsel R. et al. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74(1):14-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)91137-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)91137-3

Davis JD, Connor EE, Clark P, Wikinson ED, Duff P. Correlation between cervical cytologic results and Gram stain as diagnostic test for bacterial Vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177(3)532-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70141-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70141-8

Platz-Chistensen JJ, Larsson PG, Sudstrom E, Bondeson L. Detection of bacterial Vaginosis en Papanicolaou smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160:132-33, https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(89)90104-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(89)90104-X

Published

2009-12-31

How to Cite

Acevedo, L., & Arroyo, G. (2009). Incidence and Etiology of Infectious Vaginitis in Guatemalan Women. Revista Científica, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.EdicionEspecial2009.181

Issue

Section

Artículos originales