Análisis del nicho trófico de la comunidad de murciélagos del Parque Nacional  Laguna Lachuá: un enfoque ecomorfológico

L. Trujillo; J. López

doi:10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.v24i1.102

Authors

L. Trujillo Escuela de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala
J. López Escuela de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.v24i1.102

Keywords:

Eco morphological, trophic niche, bat, Laguna Lachuá National Park

Abstract

One way to classify and describe the trophic structure of a bat community is to identify groups of species based on the obtaining and utilization of trophic resources. Twenty four bat species were documented at Laguna Lachuá National Park, Cobán, Alta Verapaz, corresponding to 84% of the asymptote (28.45 species) estimated by the asymptotic Clench model. Food consumption could not be documented for three species. Hence, wing morphology and food items consumed were related only for 21 bat species in order to explore interspecific morphological and ecological relationships within the assemblage. The species were grouped in four functional ensembles supported by the principal component analysis of the wing parameters (wing loading, aspect ratio, wing tip shape index) and diet: narrow-space aerial insectivorous (4 species), gleaning insectivorous (4 species), carnivores (1 species) and frugivorous (12 species). The resource partitioning in the frugivorous species is mainly given by the food consumption; all the species in this group has similar characteristics and capability of flight, with smooth differences on flight speed and maneuverability. Most of the species fed primarily on four plant genera: Piper, Ficus, Cecropia and Vismia. Fruit consumption reveals a group of species that fed mainly on Piper and Vismia and other group that fed mainly on Ficus and Cecropia (≥ 0.5). In contrast, the resource partitioning in the insectivorous species is mainly given by the foraging strategy; the food consumption in this group does not reveal any particular pattern. Most of the species fed primarily on coleopterans, supporting their diets with other less common items. The results indicate that different foraging strategies and trophic selection allows the coexistence within species and plays a great role in the structure of local bat communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirre L. (2002). A structure of neotropical savanna bat community. Journal of Mammalogy, 83: 775-784. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0775:SOANSB>2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0775:SOANSB>2.0.CO;2

Arita H. (1997). Species composition and morphological structure of the bat fauna of Yucatán, México. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/5967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/5967

Fenton M.,Acharya, L., Audet, D., Hickey, M., Merriman, C., Obrist, M., Syme, D. y Adkins, B. (1992). Phyllostomid bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) as indicators of habitat disruption in the Neotropics. Biotropica, 24, 440-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388615

Fleming T. (1986). The structure of neotropical bat communities: a preliminary analysis. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 59, 135-150

Giannini N. y Kalko E. (2004). Trophic structure in a large assemblage of phyllostomids bats in Panama. Oikos, 105, 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12690.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12690.x

Jiménez A. y Hortal J. (2003). Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios ecológicos. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología. Zaragoza, España. 8, 151-161.

Kalko E. (1998). Organization and diversity of tropical bat communities through space and time. Zoology, 101, 281-297.

Krebs C. (1998). Ecological Methodology. Segunda edición. Addison Wesley Press. U.S.

McCarthy, T. J. y S. G. Pérez. (2006). Land and freshwater mammals of Guatemala: faunal documentation and diversity. Cano, E. (ed.) En: Biodiversidad de Guatemala. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala. Guatemala.

Moreno C. y Halffter G. (2000). Assessing the completness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves. British Ecological Society. Journal of Applied Ecology. 37, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00483.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00483.x

Moreno, C. (2001). Métodos para medir la biodiversidad. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. México.

Norberg, U., y Rayner, J. (1987). Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and Echolocation. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 316, 335-427. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1987.0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1987.0030

Pérez, S., López, J. y McCarthy T. (2012). Five New records of bats for Guatemala, with comments on the check list of the country. Chiroptera Neotropical, 18, 1106-1110.

Pianka E. (1973). The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413

Quinn G. y Keought M. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologist. Cambridge University Press. N.Y. USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806384

Sampaio E., Kalko E., Bernard E., Rodríguez B. y Handley Ch. (2003). A biodiversity assessment of bats in a tropical lowland rainforest of central Amazonia, including methodological and conservation considerations. Studies of Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 38, 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.38.1.17.14035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.38.1.17.14035